A review of methodological choice: Research paradigm underpins

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tharsika, K.
dc.contributor.author Pratheepkanth, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-20T09:45:54Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-09T18:50:59Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-20T09:45:54Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-09T18:50:59Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.issn 2478-1126
dc.identifier.uri http://drr.vau.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2605
dc.description.abstract This paper focuses on removing the ambiguity regarding selecting the research methodology when embarking on a research project by the researcher in the social science phenomenon. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods are the dominant methodologies in the social research milieu. Choosing an appropriate methodology is determined by the research paradigms (positivism, interpretive, transformative, and pragmatism). These paradigms are differentiated by the philosophical assumptions (ontology, epistemology, and research method). Therefore, the researcher should be aware of their philosophical assumptions because they inevitably shape the whole research project. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Jaffna en_US
dc.subject Positivism en_US
dc.subject Interpretive en_US
dc.subject Transformative and pragmatism en_US
dc.title A review of methodological choice: Research paradigm underpins en_US
dc.type Conference paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • RCBS 2020 [65]
    Research Conference on Business Studies

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account