| dc.description.abstract |
The accelerated speed of smart city projects around the world has listed network surveillance
solutions, or AI-powered CCTV, Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, and predictive policing algorithms
as prominent elements of city infrastructure. Although they can greatly improve cybersecurity
and community safety as they can deliver an opportunity to detect threats in real-time
and organize responding efforts, the widespread use of such systems provokes serious social and
ethical issues. This study discusses social effects of such technologies, which is the balancing
act between state-controlled security and personal civil rights. The study examines the negative
effects of constant surveillance on the loss of privacy and the over-surveillance of marginalized
populations using a mixed- methods approach. The evidence indicates that physical confrontations
can be averted with the help of surveillance, but, at the same time, the social tensions
can be aggravated by creating the effect of a digital panopticon and weakening the citizens’
confidence in the local authorities. The study throws the light on the Surveillance Paradox, when
the need to feel safe may lead to the lack of social belonging and freedom. The paper presents
the argument in favor of the need of Ethical-by-Design architectures through an assessment
of current governance frameworks between 2023 and 2025. It concludes that the shift towards
smart urbanism means that information must be transparent in data practices, accountable in
algorithms and participatory in policy development in order to make sure that technology leads
to social peace as opposed to structural exclusion. The paper is a roadmap that can be used by
policymakers to incorporate effective cybersecurity solutions without exposing the basic rights
of the citizenry in the ever-digitized urban environment. |
en_US |