Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Health Officials on Dengue Prevention in Sri Lanka: Ethical, Equity, and Social Implications

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shuja, M.I.M.
dc.contributor.author Thilfar, A.C.A.
dc.contributor.author Vajna, R.
dc.contributor.author Shanjeetha, M.I.
dc.contributor.author Jayasinghe, C.D.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-20T08:40:16Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-20T08:40:16Z
dc.date.issued 2026
dc.identifier.uri http://drr.vau.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2094
dc.description.abstract Dengue remains one of the most important mosquito borne diseases in Sri Lanka, causing recurrent outbreaks despite the availability of national prevention policies. This indicates a persistent gap between policy formulation and field level implementation. Such gaps are not only technical public health concerns but also raise ethical, equity, and social implications, as vulnerable communities may experience a disproportionate disease burden when prevention systems are weak. This mixed method study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of health officials involved in dengue prevention in Sri Lanka and explored system level barriers affecting implementation. A descriptive cross sectional design was used. Quantitative data were collected from 80 health officials representing Medical Officers, Public Health Inspectors/Public Health Officials, Field Workers, and Administrative Staff using a WHO adapted, translated, and pre tested questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained through 10 key informant interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Chi square tests, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Only 27.5% of participants had satisfactory knowledge of dengue prevention policy and national targets. Although attitudes were moderately positive, reported prevention practices were weak, with only 11.3% demonstrating good practices. Knowledge and practice scores differed significantly across professional groups, indicating unequal training and capacity within the workforce. Qualitative findings identified barriers such as staff and resource shortages, funding delays, weak intersectoral coordination, limited enforcement authority, training gaps, and underuse of surveillance tools. The findings highlight the need to strengthen workforce capacity, governance support, intersectoral coordination, and field level implementation. Improving dengue prevention is essential not only to reduce disease burden but also to promote fairness, public trust, and social well being. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Vavuniya en_US
dc.subject dengue en_US
dc.subject ethics en_US
dc.subject equity en_US
dc.subject health officials en_US
dc.subject policy implementation en_US
dc.subject social impact en_US
dc.title Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Health Officials on Dengue Prevention in Sri Lanka: Ethical, Equity, and Social Implications en_US
dc.type Conference full paper en_US
dc.identifier.proceedings The 2nd International Conference on Harmony and Reconciliation (ICHR2026) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ICHR - 2026 [31]
    The 2nd International Conference on Harmony and Reconciliation

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account